Hitchin Covid map: Find out how many coronavirus cases there are in our town and north Herts
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/238e0/238e01f133f424d63491768b0e12f6ccebc7ac3c" alt="Hitchin Covid map: Find out how many coronavirus cases there are in our town and north Herts as we enter lockdown. PICTURE CREDIT: Fusion Medical Animation via Unsplash Hitchin Covid map: Find out how many coronavirus cases there are in our town and north Herts as we enter lockdown. PICTURE CREDIT: Fusion Medical Animation via Unsplash"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a315f/a315f690653238e3759bd98f53b23b8c349fa56d" alt="Here's the latest Covid map of Hitchin and north Herts Here's the latest Covid map of Hitchin and north Herts"
As we all face tighter restrictions at the start of 2021, learn more about the number of Covid cases in Hitchin and north Herts with a government interactive map.
The map, which is updated with new figures every day, shows:
- the number of cases in the past seven days
- the rate of infection per 100,000 people in the population
- how the area compares to the rest of England
Each area, known as a 'Middle Super Output Area', has an average population of 7,200.
Hitchin is currently highlighted in blue which illustrates 101 - 200 cases per 100,000 people.
However, to indicate how the virus is infecting more people in north Herts, nearby Letchworth has now moved to different shades of purple - meaning rates from 400 to 799 per 100,000 people.
The rise is a worrying trend reflected in the map - which previously had a high reference point of 400 cases per 100,000 – an illustration of how the virus is spreading across the county, and the UK as a whole.
Worryingly, nearby Stevenage has a rate of 800+ per 100,000 - which is more than double what it was after the second lockdown.
The latest data is correct as of December 29, 2020.
Review the interactive map here
CHECK OUT OUR Jobs Section HERE!
hitchin vacancies updated hourly!
Click here to see more: hitchin jobs
Share: